CC Letters: Issue No. 31
April 2, 2026
Mission Statement: To preserve and publish citizen correspondence with local government as a public record of civic participation.
From: [Redacted]
Subject: Homeless/addict filth and litter and Public Officer Negligence
Date: March 29, 2026 at 5:17:48 PM PDT
To: loni.gores@clallamcountywa.gov, allison.berry@clallamcountywa.gov, casey.sixkiller@ecy.wa.gov
Dear Commissioners and Dr. Berry,
It has come to my attention that you people are not doing the jobs that the voters elected you to do. Public areas on the Olympic Peninsula have become pig stys, with human waste to discarded syringes, and everything imaginable in between. Not only is this unsightly and dangerous to kids who might explore these areas, but they are surely serious health hazards.
All this is YOUR doing! You are enabling this, not only through your drug paraphernalia handouts, but by your negligence! Do you want me to list the various RCWs that you are defying? YOU ARE BREAKING THE LAWS!
What do we, the people, have to do to make you do your jobs? We can raise the resources for a class action lawsuit or Make sure that everyone from President Trump to local people know what you are doing and not doing. RCW 9A.80.010 clearly states that your inaction on this is “Official misconduct and a Gross Misdemeanor”. It is also Failure of Duty by Public Officers, RCW 42.20.100.
You have been told about this countless times, yet you do nothing to mitigate it. In fact, by not requiring old syringes to be returned in exchange for new, you are actively contributing to this environmental mess and not ignoring the problems you cause. A simple “NO CAMPING ON PUBLIC PROPERTY” ordnance and enforcing it would go a long way toward mitigation. Requiring the return of used drug paraphernalia before new drug paraphernalia is given would also help. What would you think if we collected all this garbage and deposited it on YOUR properties? “Good for thee but not for me”? Would you charge us for littering? Why shouldn’t we, the people, charge you with the same?
A recall campaign or class action lawsuit would certainly not help your political careers, so I ask you, in the name of all the Clallam County citizens, to put an end to this environmental, health, and unsightly danger. Just look at this filth-- it’s worse than what one sees at a landfill! DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!
[Redacted], a fed up citizen
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2026 7:13 PM
To: council@cityofpa.us; Ozias, Mark <mark.ozias@clallamcountywa.gov>; Johnson, Randy <randy.johnson@clallamcountywa.gov>; French, Mike <Mike.French@clallamcountywa.gov>
Cc: 4PA <info@4pa.org>; Dunn, Christine <christine.dunn@clallamcountywa.gov>
Subject: Responsible Use of Settlement Funds for Effective Housing Solutions
Dear Mayor, Port Angeles City Council Members, and Clallam County Commissioners,
I am writing to express my concern regarding the $118,780 in public expenditure for the safe parking program at Trinity United Methodist Church in Sequim. I learned of this program during the presentation by Christine Dunn at the March 3, 2026, Port Angeles Council Meeting.
As I understand it, this program provides only three to five designated overnight parking spaces for limited hours. At a cost of approximately $39,000 per space, this represents a significant investment for very limited capacity. Furthermore, statements made by Ms. Dunn indicate the program has struggled to launch, raising questions about whether this project was properly evaluated before opioid settlement funds were committed.
The public deserves transparency regarding the use of government funds to improve church property for such a restricted scope. Settlement resources should be directed toward solutions that create measurable, durable outcomes rather than costly stopgaps. These funds could be utilized more effectively by investing in programs that support long-term recovery and housing stability. For example, allocating similar funding to nonprofits like 4PA’s Touchstone Campus could support the construction of self-sufficient tiny homes at a cost of approximately $31,000 per unit. Such an investment would produce tangible assets and provide a clear pathway toward independence.
I urge the Commission to reevaluate the cost-effectiveness of this expenditure. Additionally, I recommend that RFPs of this magnitude be advertised on the County website rather than solely in the Peninsula Daily News, where subscriptions are declining.
Our community deserves solutions that are both compassionate and fiscally responsible. I ask that you consider directing future funding toward stable and short-term housing models rather than temporary parking.
Respectfully,
[Redacted]
— — —
From: Dunn, Christine <christine.dunn@clallamcountywa.gov>
Date: Mon, Mar 9, 2026, 8:08 AM
Subject: RE: Responsible Use of Settlement Funds for Effective Housing Solutions
To: [Redacted], council@cityofpa.us <council@cityofpa.us>, Ozias, Mark <mark.ozias@clallamcountywa.gov>, Johnson, Randy <randy.johnson@clallamcountywa.gov>, French, Mike <Mike.French@clallamcountywa.gov>
Cc: 4PA <info@4pa.org>, Oppelt, Jennifer <jennifer.oppelt@clallamcountywa.gov>
Good Morning [Redacted],
Thank you for reaching out regarding housing solutions in Clallam County and for attending the Port Angeles City Council meeting.
The programs I referenced at the meeting are funded through document recording fees, specifically the Homeless Housing and Assistance and Affordable Housing funds. No opioid settlement dollars are used for these programs.
As discussed, the use of document recording fees is governed by RCW 36.22.250, which requires that at least 75 percent of the funds collected be retained and used by the county to carry out its local homeless housing plan. Clallam County’s local homeless housing plan is available on our website [linked here].
The 2021 Clallam County Homeless System: Needs and Gaps Analysis [linked here] identified safe parking as a need in our community. Following that report, the Homelessness Task Force included safe parking among the funding priorities for the last two funding cycles.
The safe parking program at Trinity United Methodist Church is a pilot program that will begin with 3–5 spaces, with the potential to expand in the future. Funding supports staffing, security, site operations and maintenance, and services for participants. These services may include assistance obtaining identification, vehicle registration, gas, and access to showers at the YMCA, among other supports. The goal is to provide a safe place for people living in their vehicles while helping them connect to services and move toward permanent housing.
All programs funded through these sources operate on a reimbursement basis. Agencies receive payment only after submitting invoices with supporting documentation.
Regarding funding for 4PA’s Touchstone Campus, these funds are awarded through a competitive Request for Proposals (RFP) process held every two years. The RFP is publicly advertised as well as being listed on our website, and any organization may submit a proposal for consideration.
Thank you for your interest in housing solutions in our community.
Respectfully,
Christine
— — —
From: Drew Schwab <Aschwab@cityofpa.us>
Date: Mon, Mar 9, 2026, 7:34 AM
Subject: Re: Responsible Use of Settlement Funds for Effective Housing Solutions
To: [Redacted], Ozias, Mark <mark.ozias@clallamcountywa.gov>, Johnson, Randy <randy.johnson@clallamcountywa.gov>, Mike.French@clallamcountywa.gov <Mike.French@clallamcountywa.gov>
Cc: 4PA <info@4pa.org>, christine.dunn@clallamcountywa.gov <christine.dunn@clallamcountywa.gov>
Hi [Redacted],
Thank you for taking the time to write and share your concerns.
The safe parking program you referenced is administered in Sequim and funded through Clallam County programs. The City of Port Angeles is not involved in the funding or administration of that project, and I don’t have additional information about how it was evaluated or implemented. Since the County Commissioners were included in this email, I hope one of them will provide more detail.
The purpose of the March 3 presentation to the Port Angeles City Council was informational. Since Clallam County Health & Human Services is a county department, several council members, myself included, wanted a better understanding of the programs they operate and how those programs affect the residents of Port Angeles as we continue evaluating ways to address homelessness locally.
While I can’t speak to the Sequim program specifically, I do share the belief that public resources should be used thoughtfully and in ways that produce durable outcomes. One approach I strongly support is the work being done by 4PA’s Touchstone Campus. During my time on the Port Angeles Planning Commission, I supported changes that made it easier to build tiny homes in our city, because I believe they can be an important affordable housing option for both temporary and long term living.
Regarding your comment about RFP advertising, I am not familiar with Clallam County’s process. Within the City of Port Angeles, requests for proposals and bids are typically posted publicly on the City’s bid portal so vendors can review opportunities and sign up for notifications when new solicitations are released. I’ve also seen them posted on social media, but I don’t know if that happens every time.
Thank you again for reaching out and for taking an interest in how these issues are addressed in our community.
Thanks,
Drew Schwab
City of Port Angeles
Council Member, Position #2
360-565-3802
from: [Redacted]
to: kenny.ocker@dnr.wa.gov
bcc: Clallamityjen@gmail.com
date: Mar 23, 2026, 7:24 AM subject: Stop the transfer of Dungeness & protection Island Refuges~!
To whom it may concern,
We here are strongly opposed to ANY transfer of public properties to ANY sovereign nation, entity, or Individuals regardless of reasons or excuses~! It is COMPLETELY unacceptable to in any way complicate, impair, or destroy the public’s 100% ownership rights to their own properties and/or lands. If any such transfer is attempted, we shall immediately commence legal actions to stop and/or reverse any infringement or corruption of the public’s rights to the property and lands that they are the sole owners and caretakers of. Additionally, we will immediately file criminal complaints against ALL Individuals who participate in ANY illegal and unlawful (unconstitutional) criminal conspiracy to steal public properties and/or lands for ANY reason whatsoever~! The general public, the owners of these public lands & properties, has NOT been informed of these plots to rob them of their property rights, so let it be known that there is a very strong objection to such illegal and unlawful underhanded dealings~!
Thank you for your attention on this matter~!
Sincerely, [Redacted]
from: [Redacted]
to: ”mike.chapman@leg.wa.gov” <mike.chapman@leg.wa.gov>
cc: ”loni.gores@clallamcountywa.gov” <loni.gores@clallamcountywa.gov>
date: Mar 31, 2026, 12:20 PM subject: Harm Reduction Program
Senator Chapman and Clallam County Commissioners
I would like to speak on harm reduction in this county. First the definition from the National Harm Reduction site:
Establishes quality of individual and community life and well-being, not necessarily the cessation of all substance uses as the criteria for successful interventions and policies. Harm reduction is a set of practical strategies and ideas aimed at reducing negative consequences associated with drug use. Harm Reduction is also a movement for social justice built on a belief in, and respect for, the rights of people who use drugs.
And in this county Allison Berry is more concerned with the “stigma” attached to those who use drugs than seeking abstinence and getting addicts off drugs. I would ask what about the people and families of this county who do not use drugs and how does this affect them?
Harm reduction equates to harm, harm for the people of this county. By allowing this to continue we see a vast number of things happening with no end in sight.
First, facts, cartels control drugs in this country, state and even into this county. We will never ever rid this country of drugs as the appetite is too huge and the money too much. The cartels absolutely LOVE Harm Reduction; this program keeps the drugs flowing and the drugs users using! And the dollars flowing to the cartels. Look at the recent drug bust at the casino hotel, operating out of a hotel room!
We see increased crimes, too many to list. We see the increased need for police/sheriff and fire to respond. Just think, if we could DECREASE the use of drugs, our first responders could be more proactive rather than reactive in our communities. First job of government is public safety!
I have been familiar with this area since 1972 where I have had family living here and would visit my relatives often. I have seen the changes over the decades. What is alarming is the crime! I worked my entire career to find a peaceful place to retire and purchased my home here 15 years ago. Little could I imagine that I would live on a road with three drug dealers. A search warrant on the house behind me pulling out pounds of meth and long guns by a felon. Little did I think I would get a call from a neighbor one day asking me to look at a baggie he found by his driveway, where he has young kids playing. It appeared to be fentanyl. I told him to call the Sheriff’s department and ask them to collect for destruction. He was told to destroy it himself. Seriously? I walk my dog every morning at dawn and evening and pass by one of the dealers’ houses and have seen deals going down in the wee hours. I have seen the destruction of what drugs do to neighborhoods and communities and you support this?
I would encourage all of you to go on ride a longs with the first responders and see first-hand what a sternum rub on an infant looks like, trying to keep the infant alive after the infant ingested the parents’ drugs, or see a repeat addict being given multiple administrations of Narcan, or go to a family and tell them their child was found dead with a needle still stuck in their arm. You need to see for yourself; you can sit behind a keyboard and be a warrior and send out articles about how good harm reduction is for this county and the reduction of deaths, but that does not substitute for seeing it first-hand. The “numbers” for what you call success can be manipulated to your liking. Those numbers do not reflect the safety of this community and true help needed for the addicted.
The continuance down the path of harm reduction is a very slow, painful death for those who continue to use with repeated use of Narcan. Do you understand and realize the destruction on the human brain and body with each use, and while waiting for the use, the lack of oxygen to the brain? Have you seen someone who has repeatedly been administered Narcan? Yet, Allison Berry uses the numbers of Narcan administration as a key number in demonstrating the reduction of overdoses. What she does not say is that this is just a delay in a long painful death. This is not compassion, not which seems to be the key word for harm reduction. Look at the realities of what this program is doing to the addicts and our community.
Additionally, harm reduction addresses the need for clean needles, to keep the addict from contracting diseases. Have you seen an addict picking up food or cigarettes from the ground? Have you seen those picking up food out of dumpster or crawling on the ground? Have you seen areas of encampment that are filthy? Have you seen the addicts with open sores? And the first concern is clean needles? I just shake my head.
And I have not even addressed the amount of dollars funding this and other programs which do nothing but keep the users, using. The dollars keep flowing in and keep those employed by these funding streams, while the addicts keep using. Very few addicts will get off drugs, without being removed and put in a managed in-house program.
In the last two weeks, I observed a man fighting with his jacket, and stomping on it, and screaming at the sky as I was coming out of Costco, he was walking north from the MAT clinic. A few days later a man standing in the road ranting words, would not move, people were cautiously trying to drive around him, I was fearing he would jump in front of a car. Two days ago, at the intersection of Priest Rd and Washington Street, I was stopped and a man by the bus stop was spewing the vilest language, so graphic, screaming at the cars going by. That same day on Washington Street a man screaming while riding a bike back and forth across lanes and in the center crashed near the bus stop rolling around and screaming. This is not normal and this should not be happening in our community!
I am beside myself in your decision to keep funding this. But being the state that Washington is, you must commit to the catchy terms of “social justice” and “rights for those who use drugs”. If there was any ounce of morality and true compassion, you would look for a reduction of drugs and drug use in this county. Not coddling addicts, but as the phrase used decades ago, tough love. The addicts need to be in treatment, in-house and when out, they simply cannot be around the old friends. A whole change must take place or guaranteed a relapse. Harm reduction is just a mere band aid with words stating to “help” but does nothing that improves any lives. I cannot even imagine what this county will be like in just a few more years, it will be unlivable for the rest of us.
Thank you for your attention to this letter,
[Redacted]
— — —
From: Ozias, Mark <mark.ozias@clallamcountywa.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2026 9:12 AM
To: [Redacted]
Subject: Harm Reduction Program
[Redacted],
Thank you for writing. While it is certainly true that no single approach or strategy will work for every person, the data is quite clear as it relates to opioid addiction that MAT is a far more-effective intervention than abstinince-based models. There are many hundreds of people in our county who are receiving MAT treatment either through their primary care physician or through a facility like the Jamestown Healing Clinic. In the west end of the county, the fire department in Clallam Bay is working with the Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe to encourage an expansion of the mobile MAT services taking place in that community because of the positive impact these services have made.
To your point on impacting the supply of drugs into the community I would highlight that we are one of only a few remaining communities in the state with a dedicated, multi-jurisdictional, drug-focused law enforcement task force called OPNET. We have continued to prioritize this effort even as state funding for these types of task forces has fallen away and OPNET continues to be a vital component of our overall effort.
Harm reduction is a well-tested and proven strategy that has two primary goals, namely preventing overdose deaths and reducing the transmission of diseases like hepatitis and HIV. Since instituting the Harm Reduction Health Center we have seen overdose deaths decrease dramatically and consistently. Furthermore there is great community benefit when infectious diseases are not circulating among the population, and when people can receive basic support and medical treatment for things like wound care rather than entering into the emergency room for care. I have done both ride-alongs with the Sheriff as well as a “walk-along” with the PA Fire Department and their Community Paramedic program I have had the chance to learn first-hand, from first-responders, about the positive impact that this type of care at the Harm Reduction Health Center is making.
If your argument is “let them die rather than trying to save their life with Narcan” I would just say that I do not agree with you, though I certainly know others who share your opinion.
It would be a huge benefit to have more inpatient treatment and inpatient detox available, but these assets are largely market-driven. I am working with partners to better understand what kind of funding/incentive package would be necessary to create even a half dozen inpatient detox beds in our county for county residents but the reality is that this is a very steep uphill climb because inpatient detox is a money-loser for providers.
Obviously there is more work to be done, but it is important to understand that it is not harm reduction that is causing people to live on the street and/or to be addicted to drugs. Rather it is the lack of affordable housing and a decayed social safety net that are leaving people without options.
Sincerely,
Mark O
Mark Ozias
Clallam County Commissioner
* Please note my new email address: mark.ozias@clallamcountywa.gov
* This correspondence may be subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act.
from: [Redacted]
to: loni.gores@clallamcountywa.gov
bcc: clallamityjen@gmail.com
date: Mar 29, 2026, 10:02 PM subject: Accountability and Enforcement of Public Health Laws in Clallam County
Commissioners,
I am writing as a Clallam County resident to ask for clear accountability from both the Board of Health and Dr. Allison Berry regarding the ongoing public health and safety problems tied to unchecked outdoor living, drug use, waste accumulation, and environmental contamination throughout the county.
Washington law is explicit about your responsibilities. Under RCW 70.05.060, local boards of health are required to “supervise all matters pertaining to the preservation of the life and health of the people” and to ensure the “prevention, control, and abatement of nuisances detrimental to public health.” Likewise, RCW 70.05.070 requires the local Health Officer to enforce public health laws and to “take such action as is necessary to maintain health and sanitation” and to “control and abate nuisances.”
These conditions also meet the definition of a public health nuisance under RCW 7.48.120, which includes anything that endangers health or safety, offends decency, or renders others insecure in the use of public spaces.
Despite these clear statutory obligations, hazardous conditions—solid waste, human waste, drug‑use debris, and environmental contamination—continue to persist across the county. Residents, volunteers, and property owners are left to manage risks that fall squarely within the legal duties of the Board of Health and the Health Officer.
I am asking the Board to do the following:
• Acknowledge that these conditions constitute public health nuisances under state law. • Explain why enforcement authority under RCW 70.05.060 and RCW 70.05.070 is not being used consistently. • Hold Dr. Allison Berry accountable for fulfilling her statutory responsibilities as Health Officer. • Provide a clear plan outlining what actions will be taken, on what timeline, and with what measurable outcomes.
We deserve a functioning public health system—one that enforces existing laws, protects our environment, and ensures that families can safely use public spaces. I urge you to take immediate, lawful action to restore public health and safety in our community.
Sincerely,
[Redacted]
— — —
From: Ozias, Mark <mark.ozias@clallamcountywa.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2026 9:50 AM
To: [Redacted]
Subject: Accountability and enforcement of public health laws
[Redacted],
Thank you for writing. What Dr. Berry has said, and I agree, is that “the primary drivers of homelessness in this county and this country are a rapid rise in the cost of living combined with massive cuts to the social safety net at the federal and to a lesser extent state level.” Neither Dr. Berry nor the County Commissioners have control over these trends, though we sure are working hard to deal with them.
Regarding the authorities of the public health officer, when a solid waste complaint is made then our Environmental Health team investigates and then notifies the owner of the property. The owner is then given a reasonable time to remediate that problem. If they do not, then fines accrue. Dr. Berry is not a police officer and cannot arrest or forcibly move anyone, and would not have the legal authority to pursue that without the above process. In the case of people living homeless on someone else’s land, the enforcement action would be against the owner, not the person camping. The owner would then need to move the person along.
For a number of years the county utilized our CREW (chain gang) to assist with significant environmental cleanups. We have been chronically understaffed the past five years to the point where these efforts have been precluded, but I am happy to report that we are finally on track to be fully-staffed with Corrections Deputies and I hope to see this important service pick back up as soon as capacity allows. I am certainly open to consideration of other targeted cleanup strategies coordinated by a local municipality.
I agree with your point that we need a functioning public health system, but unfortunately after seeing meaningful state investment in public health after COVID we are now seeing those investments being peeled away. Furthermore the federal government has decimated the public safety net, most recently through the “Big Beautiful Bill Act” that will cause something like 10 million people across America to lose their health insurance while at the same time losing vital supports like SNAP benefits and reducing investments in housing supports. Inadequate Medicaid reimbursement rates only exacerbate the challenge, especially in rural communities.
Sincerely,
Mark O
Mark Ozias
Clallam County Commissioner
* Please note my new email address: mark.ozias@clallamcountywa.gov
* This correspondence may be subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act.
— — —
from: [Redacted]
to: ”Ozias, Mark” <mark.ozias@clallamcountywa.gov>
bcc: clallamityjen@gmail.com
date: Apr 1, 2026, 6:56 PM subject: Re: Accountability and enforcement of public health laws
Commissioner Ozias,
Thank you for your response. I appreciate the explanation of current processes, but it does not address the core issue raised in my original email.
My concern is not the broader causes of homelessness, nor whether the Health Officer has arrest authority. The issue is the consistent enforcement of existing public health laws—specifically those requiring the abatement of conditions that constitute a public health nuisance under state law.
You outlined a complaint-based process that relies on notifying property owners and allowing time for remediation. However, this does not explain why hazardous conditions—solid waste, human waste, and drug-use debris—continue to persist in a visible and ongoing way across the county, both on public and private property.
To be clear, I am asking for accountability on the following points:
• Do you acknowledge that these conditions meet the statutory definition of a public health nuisance?
• How is enforcement being applied in cases involving public land, rights-of-way, or situations where no responsible private property owner is present?
• What specific actions are taken when violations are not remedied after notice and fines?
• What measurable steps will the County take to ensure that existing laws are enforced consistently going forward?
I understand there are resource constraints and broader systemic challenges. However, those do not negate the County’s legal obligation to enforce public health laws and protect residents from ongoing environmental and health hazards.
I am asking for a clear explanation of how the County intends to meet those obligations in practice.
Sincerely,
[Redacted]
DNR is accepting written comments regarding Trust Land Transfer proposals until April 15, 2026.
Comments can be emailed to: dnrtltprogram@dnr.wa.gov
Include clallamityjen@gmail.com in the BCC field to have your email published in Clallam County Letters.
Trust Land Transfer program web page: https://dnr.wa.gov/land-transactions/trust-land-transfer/proposed-and-current-transfers
Trust Land Transfer program manual: https://dnr.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2025-08/amp_tlt_manual.pdf
See also:
Redress Government at the Town Hall on Public Safety:
When: Thursday, April 16th, from 6:30 – 8:30 PM
Where: Fairview Grange 619, located at 161 Lake Farm Rd, Port Angeles
What: Organized by the Peoples Forum, this is a free event for people to ask questions of the four panelists from local government and law enforcement.
Click the Calendar Invite for more information including a PDF of the press release for the event. RSVP to the event through Google and it will add the information to your calendar:
Learn about the Calico Cat Club, the Peoples Forum, and how to get involved:
Next Issue: Monday, April 6, 2026
Now Accepting Rejected Letters to Local Newspapers:
Have you had a letter to the editor rejected from the Sequim Gazette or the Peninsula Daily News? Clallam County Letters will publish it.
While this blog is focused on letters to elected officials and government, it is also a platform for the silenced, unheard, and ignored voices of Clallam County residents.
Email your letter, along with the response from the newspaper stating why they wouldn’t print the letter, to clallamityjen@gmail.com. Names, emails, and personal information will be redacted from published letters. Clallam County Letters:
Clallam County commissioners can be redressed by the people via email:
Mark Ozias: Mark.Ozias@clallamcountywa.gov
Randy Johnson: Randy.Johnson@clallamcountywa.gov
Mike French: Mike.French@clallamcountywa.gov
Loni Gores, Clerk: Loni.Gores@clallamcountywa.gov
Find all other Clallam County officials, offices, and employees in the staff directory.
To have your letter published in Clallam County Letters, please include clallamityjen@gmail.com in the BCC field.
Public Record Notice:
Published correspondences were transmitted to local government offices and copied, or forwarded by the sender, to the publisher. They are reproduced here as received.
Personal identifiers have been redacted where appropriate to protect individual privacy. No substantive alterations have been made.
Publication of this material is for record-keeping and transparency purposes only and does not constitute endorsement, analysis, or opinion by the publisher.
Here’s a great thing to consider when Ozias says: In the case of people living homeless on someone else’s land, the enforcement action would be against the owner, not the person camping. The owner would then need to move the person along.
So, if the land someone is camping on is public land, then, by his rationale, it would be up to the owners of the land to move the person along. And yet, how many city councilmembers continue to push the idea that moving a homeless person doesn’t solve the problem, it only moves it somewhere else.
Well, apparently that is what the owners of the land have a right to do — move the person along, according to Ozias.
Granted, Jake Seegers addressed this issue by showing that the law uses the word occupancy, not ownership. Like the case of a local property where the owner has passed away and now the squatters have taken over. No owner doesn’t mean public health hazards can go ignored when the land is occupied, not just owned.
And just like I pointed out in my Clallamity Jen article today; the commissioners think they have a say over ICE, a federal agency, when it comes to wearing masks, yet they don’t have the same interest in having a say over their own county and the laws that regulate it.
Delusional dolts, that’s who is running this county and it shows.
I am shocked Ozias wrote this... "it is important to understand that it is not harm reduction that is causing people to live on the street and/or to be addicted to drugs. Rather it is the lack of affordable housing and a decayed social safety net that are leaving people without options."
His framing leaves out a critical piece: personal responsibility.
A lack of affordable housing does not cause addiction. People don’t become addicted to fentanyl because rent is too high. Addiction is a behavioral and medical issue that requires accountability and treatment.
What we’re seeing is the combination of widespread drug availability, reduced enforcement, and systems that offer services without requiring change. When there are no expectations or consequences, behavior doesn’t improve.
Housing matters—but it does not explain open drug use, or the chronic homelessness that refuses services. Many people face high housing costs and do not end up on the street.
If we want better outcomes, the approach has to be balanced: support and housing, yes—but also enforcement, expectations, and accountability.
Without that, we’re not solving the problem—we’re enabling it.